Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Players' Guide to the Cities/Fighting and Other Actions"

From Paragon Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Title)
 
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
::Well that explains... a lot. So should this be a player guide, then, or what? Do we have some sort of notification to indicate articles written from the official manual? [[User:Felderburg|Felderburg]] 15:04, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 
::Well that explains... a lot. So should this be a player guide, then, or what? Do we have some sort of notification to indicate articles written from the official manual? [[User:Felderburg|Felderburg]] 15:04, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
::: While the ''original'' title and content were from the manual, much of the content has been modified since to reflect changes to the game. So I think the player guide template should stay on. Labeling it as being from the official manual would be wrong (or at least misleading) since we've modified it. It might not be a bad idea to add something to [[The Players' Guide to the Cities|the guide's main page]] that notes that the content and structure was originally derived from the player manual, though. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 17:37, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:37, 1 April 2014

Combat Terminology

Should we make each of these a separate definition entry? --Eabrace 14:24, 28 August 2007 (EDT)

Title

I'm not really sure this article matches its title. It's sort of more a general combat system article than just fighting / healing / controlling. I may be reading it wrong, but I just have a sense of... weirdness... about the title of the article versus its content, for some reason. I think because the first section is so little about "Fighting and Other Actions" and more about the UI. Maybe Combat & Status or Combat: UI & Powers ? Felderburg 15:11, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Original title and content were pulled from the manual that came with the game. I blame whoever wrote that.  :) --Eabrace Healthbar notify phone.png 06:32, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Well that explains... a lot. So should this be a player guide, then, or what? Do we have some sort of notification to indicate articles written from the official manual? Felderburg 15:04, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
While the original title and content were from the manual, much of the content has been modified since to reflect changes to the game. So I think the player guide template should stay on. Labeling it as being from the official manual would be wrong (or at least misleading) since we've modified it. It might not be a bad idea to add something to the guide's main page that notes that the content and structure was originally derived from the player manual, though. -- Sekoia 17:37, 1 April 2014 (UTC)